A few days ago I received some criticism from some members over at the site Atheist Nexus. They do raise some points that should be addressed because they continue to come up. I would have addressed these comments over on AN, but alas and alack, I have been locked off of the site. My crimes? I have been accused of being a spammer, a person of low moral quality and finally, one who may contribute to genocide, of all things, because I embrace something known as free speech. And this was practically my first day there. Imagine what a week would have brought? Rikers? Caning?

Well, let’s look at a few things. First, some lady who runs one of the groups over there mentions that I refer to my fellow human beings with terms like imbeciles, morons, oh I don’t know, pieces of garbage perhaps. Oh my god, she caught me, she outed me. The lady then, and here is the really good part, she then goes on to mention a book she is reading, that says that people who refer to people like this are morally low, and/or substandard. Oh my goodness!

Now before I address that scientific observation, let’s look at another thing that has recently been sweeping the Internet. It seems somebody somewhere just did some kind of study that said that the left was more intelligent than the right. I remember another study like this that said that both atheists and the left were both more intelligent than the religious and the right. So now look at what we have. If you don’t agree with us, we progressive, left-leaning, truth-bearing atheists, you are not only mentally inferior, but you are now also morally inferior. The old double whammy. The daily double. You better agree with us, or we’ll call you foul names. How do we know this, well it’s right here in the book. Now, if I wanted to, just to ring up a few points, I could claim the atheist part showing my mental superiority. Will I do this? Hmm. No I don’t think so. Why?

(And here’s where the first part of this comes into play about the way I refer to people). Because nobody but a fucking, ass-licking, dumb-shit, motherfucking moronic piece of diseased sewage could and would believe such unmitigated garbage. That’s why. The fucking brain-dead left, never has anything to back up their specious, utopian, dead-on-arrival arguments except the kind of cheap rhetoric that one of their kind writes in his new book or publishes in his new study. Are you not aware that anybody that is even barely conscious can throw any set of facts into a blender, add a couple of eggs and then pour out anything that they want. There is no science here, no men in lab coats, no empiricism, just some fucking troll who gerrymanders, jury-rigs and then Jerry Lewises it into anything he wants it to say.

So these are their arguments. No facts, no science, no nothing. They concoct books and studies that prove they are right and everybody else is wrong. That is the weight of their arguments. And if you don’t agree with their juvenile philosophy of how the world Should Be (according to them) you’ll have vile names hurled at you.

Simply for clarification, I’m a sort of quasi-libertarian. I also don’t like the conservatives. I think Matt Stone (South Park) said it best, “I hate the conservatives, but I really hate the liberals.” You guys are all just opposite sides of the same coin. The right guided by its religious fantasies and the left guided by its quasi-religious social fantasies, and between the two (the right’s warfare state, and the left’s welfare state) you’ve managed to bankrupt the country. And both sides underpinned by nothing but comfort-giving (toward themselves) illusions. Dumb, fucking, imbecilic morons.

Now, the leader of this AN group went on to say that my embracing of free speech could be very bad, I think the dreaded H word was used, you know…hate, and by opposing political correctness I could be supporting genocide of this or that group of my wonderful fellow human mutants. So now, a few words about this nonsense. This is the second arrow in the left’s quiver. First we’ll say you’re dumb and/or morally bankrupt, if that doesn’t work, we’ll bring on the politically correct goon squad. And their only job will be to suppress free-speech so we can live in the world that “they” think we should be living in. Oh thank you.

Well, briefly, in 1859 John Stuart Mill in “On Liberty” wrote about the various nuances involved with freedom of speech. Mill opined that there was both a harm principle and an offense principle. Mill rightly stated that the only principle that should be applied was the harm principle, not the offense principle. Meaning that if harm was being advocated, suppression would be warranted. I would agree, but there are already laws on the books for these types of infractions. What has happened of course, is that nowadays anything and everything that may offend someone is thrown into the mix, resulting in a serious chilling of the notion of free speech. Here’s a little news flash for you elites that would instruct us in how to live. You are not qualified to tell us, well…anything. Is somebody offended by something? Tough. That’s the price one pays for living in a free society, which Mill, at least, understood. Again harm and offense. Harm legitimate, offense, not.

So, my good friend Mill and I think you are fucking numbskulls. By the way, in a list I saw, Mill’s IQ was rated at over 200, making him, in this estimate, one of the smartest people that has ever lived. To the best of my knowledge there is only one person alive today that actually exceeds Mill’s estimated number, but modesty prevents me from saying anything further.